UA-5095748-1

Thursday, March 19, 2026

What is a meaningful goal in my 50s?

Once I started down the path of wellness, I got overwhelmed fast. YouTube podcasts, books, social media, medical research -- the confident and respectable opinions seem endless. Doctors full of technical jargon. Well-meaning influencers with their own frameworks and formulas. Everyone has an answer. The problem isn't a lack of information. It's knowing where to start and whom to listen to.

I was so confused that I had to step back and ask myself a different question entirely: what's going to sustain me to make a genuine effort to learn and change?

I needed something more compelling than "get healthy" or "lose weight." Those are fine goals on paper, but they don't move me out of bed on a cold morning. They don't hold up against the gravitational pull of what's familiar, comfortable, and easy. I needed a meaningful vision for the next three decades -- not a resolution, not a metric, but a picture of the person I want to become.

So I created a vision of myself in my 70s.

Once that image crystallized in my mind, something shifted. I realized I'm on the wrong trajectory. Doing the same things because they're familiar, not because they're right. Without change, I'm like a driver with hands off the wheel on autopilot, heading to some destination I didn't intentionally pick and doubt I would have liked. The scariest part? I still have opportunities to make changes, especially now. I have time. I can still muster the energy. That window doesn't stay open forever.

Here is my vision.

credit: ChatGPD generated image

When I'm in my 70s:

·   I see myself hiking to a mountain top along with family, grandkids, and friends. Not riding a cart to a scenic overlook -- actually hiking, under my own power, with people I love.

·   I'm an active person full of vitality and positive energy. The kind of person who lifts up a room, not drains it.

·   I'm a loving husband and father. Present, engaged, not just physically there but emotionally available.

·   I'm a kind and thoughtful friend. Someone people want to call, not someone who disappeared into routine.

·   I'm a caretaker of family, finances, and home. Not a burden, but the person others can lean on.

·   I'm making my corner of the world a better place by giving back -- time, knowledge, resources.

·   I'm the master of my time, space, and choices. Freedom and optionality, not obligation and regret.

Here's what I've noticed about this kind of goal-setting: the vision isn't about achievements. It's about identity. "Lose 20 pounds" is a target. "Be the person who hikes a mountain with my grandkids" is a direction. Targets can be hit or missed, and once they're done, the motivation evaporates. A direction keeps pulling you forward.

I'm not locked into this vision. Life will throw curveballs and the picture will evolve. But it needs to be powerful enough to sustain action and change right now. Powerful enough that when I'm staring at conflicting advice from ten different experts, I can ask myself one simple question: does this move me closer to the person I want to be at 70?

That filter cuts through the noise remarkably well.

What's your vision of yourself in 30 years? And is your current trajectory taking you there?

Ricky

__________________________________________________

Note: This blog post was AI-generated, simulating my writing voice based on my previous blog posts. While the ideas and direction are mine, the actual prose was significantly written by AI. I believe in transparency about AI-assisted content creation.

Note: image generated by Chatgpt


Wednesday, March 18, 2026

How my mental model of aging has changed.

For most of my life, I thought of aging like a countdown timer. You start with a full tank of biological, cognitive, and emotional capacity, and it just... ticks down. Every year, a little less. Every decade, noticeably less. Who hasn't used the phrase "having a senior moment" or joked about things falling apart after 40?

Under this mental model, the best you can do is slow the countdown. We study the outliers -- the centenarians in Blue Zones, the Mediterranean diet devotees, the genetically blessed few who seem to defy the clock. We listen to influencers and researchers, hoping to copy their secret sauce. And underlying all of it is a quiet fatalism: aging is inevitable decline, and you're just managing the rate of decay.

My recent reading and research have completely reframed this for me. Aging is not mechanistically deterministic. But it's also not a disease you can pop a pill for. It's actually three interconnected processes:

1. Programmed withdrawal of maintenance investment -- After reproductive maturity, the body gradually stops investing in repair and upkeep. Evolution optimized us to reproduce, not to last forever. Once you've passed your genes along, the maintenance budget gets slashed. Thomas Kirkwood formalized this as the Disposable Soma Theory in his 1977 Nature paper, arguing that organisms face an evolutionary trade-off: energy spent on reproduction can't be spent on cellular repair. The body is, from evolution's perspective, expendable once the genes are passed on.

2. Cascading quality-control failure -- Cellular error-checking degrades over time. One broken process leads to another, which leads to another. Small failures compound into systemic ones. López-Otín et al. mapped this out in their landmark 2013 paper "The Hallmarks of Aging" in Cell, identifying nine interconnected hallmarks -- from genomic instability to loss of proteostasis to stem cell exhaustion -- that cascade into each other. When protein quality-control fails, misfolded proteins accumulate, overwhelm the cleanup systems, and trigger dysfunction across the entire cell.

3. Self-amplifying inflammatory spiral -- The immune system starts misidentifying internal signals as threats, creating chronic inflammation that accelerates damage. Your body is essentially attacking itself based on bad intelligence. Claudio Franceschi coined the term "inflammaging" in his 2000 paper in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, describing a chronic, sterile, low-grade inflammation that develops with age. The vicious part: the inflammation itself generates more cellular debris, which triggers more inflammation -- a self-amplifying loop that accelerates every other aging process.

Yeah, it's a mouthful. I'll dive deeper into each of these in future posts. But here's why this reframe matters so much.

The old model gives you no agency. You're a passenger watching the fuel gauge drop. Maybe you drive more efficiently, but the destination is the same.

The new model gives you levers to pull. And if you're a tech person like me, the analogy clicks immediately: this is a legacy system with deferred maintenance, compounding technical debt, and a monitoring system that's generating false alerts.

The "aha moment" for me is that we have agency over each of these three processes:

·   Maintenance withdrawal? We can forcibly trigger maintenance programs. Exercise, fasting, cold exposure, sleep optimization -- these aren't just "healthy habits." They're signals that tell your body to reinvest in repair.

·   Quality-control failures? We can isolate failure modes, build redundancy, and support the error-checking systems that are degrading. Think of it as adding automated tests and circuit breakers to a fragile codebase.

·   Inflammatory spiral? We can reduce the noise, calm the false alarms, and address the root causes of chronic inflammation rather than just treating symptoms.

In other words, pay down the tech debt and incrementally refactor the system.

And just like in engineering, you don't start by rewriting everything from scratch. You:

  • Measure -- Identify the biggest risks with biomarkers and diagnostics
  • Prioritize -- Find the low-hanging fruit and the investments that move the needle most
  • Invest -- Put time and energy into rebuilding infrastructure and changing environmental factors
  • Iterate -- Reassess, adjust, repeat

This isn't about chasing immortality or buying into the latest longevity hype cycle. It's about shifting from a fatalistic "manage the decline" mindset to an engineering mindset: understand the system, find the leverage points, and do the work.

I'm still early in this journey, and I could be wrong about plenty of the specifics. But the mental model shift alone has been transformative. It's the difference between watching a countdown timer and having a dashboard full of dials you can actually turn.

credit: Gemini generated image

What's your mental model of aging? Are you watching a timer, or turning dials?

__________________________________________________

Note: This blog post was AI-generated, simulating my writing voice based on my previous blog posts. While the ideas and direction are mine, the actual prose was significantly written by AI. I believe in transparency about AI-assisted content creation.

References

1. Kirkwood, T.B.L. (1977). "Evolution of ageing." Nature. (Disposable Soma Theory)

2. López-Otín, C. et al. (2013). "The Hallmarks of Aging." Cell, 153(6), 1194-1217.

3. Franceschi, C. et al. (2000). "Inflamm-aging." Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 908, 244-254.


Tuesday, March 17, 2026

My wellness journey so far

See footer about AI generation, and the explanation in this post about why the AI usage.

I spent 30 years in tech optimizing systems. Building dashboards, monitoring performance, setting alerts when metrics drift out of range. Turns out I forgot to monitor the most important system I own — my body.

I've been semi-retired for about a year and a half now. The finances are in good shape. I wrote extensively about that journey — budgeting (or lack thereof), retirement withdrawal strategies, debt as financial trust. I felt good about where things landed. But here's the uncomfortable truth I've been avoiding: while I was building financial health, I was accumulating massive "tech debt" in my physical health.

credit: Gemini generated image

Anyone in software knows what tech debt feels like. You ship fast, cut corners on testing, skip the refactor, defer the migration. It works fine... until it doesn't. Then one day you're staring at a codebase that's brittle, slow, and expensive to change. That's my body right now.

The DEXA scan wake-up call

I got a DEXA scan last year. For those unfamiliar, it's a full body composition scan — it tells you exactly how much fat, muscle, and bone you have, and where. The results were a gut punch.

·   Total Lean Mass (BMI-L): 7th percentile

·   Limb Lean Mass (ALMI): 10th percentile

Let that sink in. Less than 10th percentile. That means over 90% of people my age have more muscle mass than I do. I spent decades sitting at a desk, staring at screens, eating whatever was convenient, and optimizing everything except the one thing that actually keeps me alive. Yes, there must be sampling bias from people that would get a DEXA scan, but the number is still very low.

The financial equivalent would be having a credit score in the 300s. You can recover from it, but it takes deliberate, sustained effort. And the longer you wait, the harder it gets.

Why this matters more in my 50s

Here's what I've been learning about sarcopenia — age-related muscle loss. After 30, we lose about 3-8% of muscle mass per decade (Volpi et al., Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, 2004) . After 50, the rate accelerates accelerates — with strength declining even faster approximately 1-2% per year (Larsson et al., Physiological Reviews, 2019). . Muscle isn't just about looking fit. It's one of strongest independent predictor of longevity in older adults (Srikanthan & Karlamangla, The American Journal of Medicine, 2014). Low muscle mass is correlated with:

·   Higher risk of falls and fractures sarcopenia associated with 1.6x increased fall risk and 1.84x fracture risk (Yeung et al., Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 2019)

·   Insulin resistance and metabolic disease — higher relative muscle mass significantly associated with better insulin sensitivity (Srikanthan & Karlamangla, JCEM, 2011)

·   Reduced mobility and independence — low muscle mass associated with 1.65x increased odds of losing physical independence (dos Santos et al., Journal of Cachexia, Sarcopenia and Muscle, 2017)

·   Higher all-cause mortality — low muscle mass associated with 1.57x increased mortality risk across 81,000+ participants (Xu et al., PLoS ONE, 2023)

In personal finance terms, muscle is like a retirement account — the earlier you invest, the more it compounds. I'm late to this game, but not too late.

What's next for this blog

In my earlier posts, I set out to blog every weekday and work through complex life decisions publicly. The personal finance chapter was Phase 1. Now I want to open Phase 2 with two themes that I've become deeply curious about:

1. Learning to effectively use AI — I've spent my career in tech but AI is moving so fast that even veterans need to be intentional about learning. I want to explore how AI tools can augment my thinking, writing, and decision-making. Meta point: this blog itself is becoming a testbed for that.

2. Optimizing wellness and longevity — Starting from the 10th percentile means I have a lot of room for improvement. I want to document what I'm learning about exercise science, nutrition, body composition, and the mental shifts required to prioritize health after decades of neglecting it.

These two interests are more connected than they appear. AI is becoming a powerful tool for personalized health optimization — analyzing bloodwork, designing training programs, parsing research papers. And the discipline of learning AI well is itself a cognitive health practice.

The framework I'm adopting

Similar to how I think about personal finance, I want to build a framework rather than chase random advice. Here's my starting mental model:

·   Measure — You can't improve what you don't track. DEXA scans, bloodwork, strength benchmarks. The equivalent of tracking expenses on Quicken for 30 years.

·   Understand — Learn the science behind the metrics. Why does muscle mass matter? What actually drives hypertrophy? Same as learning how credit scores actually work before trying to improve one.

·   Act with principles — Just like principled spending beats budgeting, I need principles for training and nutrition that I can sustain for decades, not a 90-day program.

·   Verify and adjust — Trust the process but check the data. Semi-annual and annual reviews, just like the family council for finances.

I'm starting from a position of humility here. I know almost nothing about exercise science compared to what I know about software and finance. But I believe that the process of going from ignorant to competent follows the same pattern regardless of domain — and documenting that journey publicly is the best way I know to stay accountable.

What's one area of your health that you know has been accumulating "tech debt"?

──────────────────────────────────────────────────

Note: This blog post was AI-generated, simulating my writing voice based on my previous blog posts. While the ideas and direction are mine, the actual prose was significantly written by AI. I believe in transparency about AI-assisted content creation.